10 thoughts on “THE DAILY PLASMA”

1. Andrew,
   I just read a Radiometric Dating piece above. You said “…The study found Zircons from Vredefort had been miss-dated by as much as a billion years…” as a quote or near-so from Cavosie’s article. Even if this is so, and I don’t know if this is a chicken or egg situation, this simply places the zircon formation in the context of the Geology of the Vredefort region. I think the author from NASA is a bit over-dramatic in his assertions. Certainly his point is good as far as it goes – no problem.

   Regards,
   Ian Shears

   LikeLike

   Reply

2. Hi Andy,
   I enjoy your work and lectures. I posted this on the Thunderbolts forum a few days back. I was wondering if you might be interested and able to offer some advice.
   Terry

   http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=363&start=525

   Here is some of my correspondence to another researcher.

   I have been researching everything Velikovsky since the late 1980’s, and recently Jno Cook’s Saturnian Cosmology and related information.
   I was wondering if you would be able to assist me with a problem.
   Suppose there were geological features – lines – that ran perfectly east-west parallel to each other, and other lines that ran perfectly north-south, also parallel to each other and by default perpendicular to the east-west formations. These line formations, hypothetically, appear to be ‘pinched’ like one might pinch a line into existence with one’s thumb and forefinger over the surface of some modelling clay. They are subtle but undeniable and the total grid-like feature extends over hundreds of square kilometers.
   Nature does not normally make straight lines in the geological setting. Geological features are typically chaotic and jagged in appearance. These ‘pinched’ lines are not man-made. In an excavated cross section nearby one formation (not itself part of the grid-like formation), one can clearly see a magma core up-welling covered by a layer of baked clay, in other words, evidently not man-made. Mechanisms caused by magma, impact (comets, asteroids and meteorites, etc.), glacier and erosion, etc. would be discounted leaving only an electrical cause.
   Do you know any electrical or magnetic properties and/or mechanisms which could – hypothetically – account for such geological formations?
   If sometime during the catastrophic age Earth’s surface was struck by an interplanetary plasma discharge, would it be possible for that discharge to interact with Earth’s electromagnetic field and somehow cause an effect on Earth’s surface like I have described above? Something, maybe, like magnetic flux lines or magnetosonic waves being ‘pinched’ onto a given terrain during a high energy electrical event?
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetosonic_wave

   and also

   Dear Mr. —-,

   First of all allow my to say how much I value your research and effort in sharing it through your written works. I stumbled on your Saturnian Cosmology last year and it has provided me with the framework to clear up and deepen my understanding of a great many topics. I would be understating it to say I was ecstatic when I found your information. Would it be too obvious to say it hit me like a bolt of lightning?

   As to your reply concerning my inquiry you indicated you have responded on other occasions to the same questions from people and they have gone on to create websites. Do you have any links to these websites? I would like to see if the geological formations they are observing have any similarity to the ones in my area.

   Over the years I have also extensively studied ley lines as well and agree with you as to the motivation people had back then to create these. I have dismissed the ley line possibility primarily because the formations I am exploring are not man-made. They are natural, again with the exception of being ‘too straight’.

   I am also familiar with formations left over from glaciers – eskers, moraines, drumlins – which we also have in our area. I have dismissed this as a possibility as well for a number of reasons – primarily these are not gravel ridges or deposits of any kind like that.

   In your response you mentioned ‘canals’. In my initial correspondence to Andrew I only mentioned ridges and ‘pinching’. I have not observed any canals or trenching. These ridges stop at the bank of a river, creek, stream or even rill and continue on at the other bank. Similar perhaps to some of Michael Steinbacher’s observations where he thinks the electricity ‘jumps over’ the water. In some locations, instead of a ridge, this effect may cut a steeper embankment into the side of a hill, for example, but there do not seem to be any grooves, trenches or canals per se. I am still exploring so I could quite possibly be wrong on that count.

   You mentioned that these east-west/north-south lines could possibly be lightning scars, but as very large arcs. I am still trying to understand the mechanism by which lightning would make such an effect on the earth’s surface that is so straight.

   Is Neil Thompson’s mechanism still under wraps? I would love to hear it.

   In the meantime, I will keep exploring these features and perhaps at some point I will gather enough data to make a presentation of some sort and perhaps after that someone may be able to table a theory for a mechanism.

   (There has been no more correspondence since then).

   I would like to add that I believe I have found those canal sites. Search ‘Atlantis canals’. The features on these sites are not similar to the ones I am exploring.
   Also, I might add that the lines which I am exploring are ‘dashed lines’ in that the geological formations are not necessarily continuous across the terrain.
   Also, these features are 25+/- yards across consistently and are located in North America. I haven’t looked on other continents. The may be there, too, – I don’t know either way at this point. Sorry I can’t be more specific about the location. To be honest I still don’t quite trust what I am seeing in the field and I would like to spent more time exploring before I disclose and make a proper fool out of myself -in the event I am wrong.

   In short, does Electric Universe/Electric Earth Geology theory, or any electric or magnetic mechanisms -theoretical or otherwise- predict or describe the geological features I have described above?
   Any help from anyone here on the forum would be appreciated!

   Thanks,

   Terry

   LikeLike

   Reply

   1. Terry,
      What you describe sounds like features I have seen in Utah, near Moab. The features near Moab look like giant pancake shaped rocks stuck sideways in the ground in linear patterns. What I see is the rocks are shaped by the electric field as it undulated with waves moving over the land. I wouldn’t be surprised if there are interference patterns in the rock grid you describe, where there are lanes with no rock, then lanes with rock. An electric field can segregate things into parallel lanes along it’s potential gradient, which can take the form of voltage steps across the dielectric material in between. Increasing the voltage gradient would pinch together the material between, forming lanes or ridge lines of rock..

      LikeLike

      Reply

   2. Hi Terry,
      Thanks for reading. I think the type of formation you describe may be the result of the electric field becoming so strong between earth and sky that it literally pulls matter up from the ground, creating the humps you describe. The linear cross-hatching is something I actually see quite often in dyke formations and quartz veins in the mountains, although at a smaller scale. There are many places where I find checkerboard lines across large expanses of rock. I attribute the cause to reflected shock waves reverberating in the rock as it is solidifying, or recombining. Shock waves, and reflected shock waves, will carry current. Because of the right hand rule, I think they induce current in a perpendicular path, and so wave sets orient themselves at ninety degrees to each other.
      I hope this helps, although, without seeing what you are describing, I’m not placing a high confidence level on my answer.
      Thanks,
      Andy

      LikeLike

      Reply

3. Aw, this was an incredibly nice post. Taking a few minutes and actual
   effort to create a top notch article… but what can I say… I put things off a lot and
   never seem to get nearly anything done.

   LikeLike

   Reply

4. One gram of caesium-137 has an activity of 3.215 terabecquerel (TBq).

   The Pacific Ocean is estimated to contain 187 quintillion gallons of water.

   It is (said to be) the most problematic of the short-to-medium-lifetime fission products because it easily moves and spreads in nature due to the high water solubility of caesium’s most common chemical compounds, which are salts. So if one gram of cesium 137 is dissolved in the entire Pacific Ocean, do you have a big problem?

   If so, your odds of encountering even one atom of this cesium 137 is 1.60427807e-8, less than 2 in a hundred million. This most certainly must be considered a low dose.

   Your odds of being struck by lightning this year are 1 in 960,000. In your lifetime those odds drop to about 1 in 12,000. Your odds of being struck by lightning twice in your lifetime are 1 in 9 million, which is still a higher chance than winning the Powerball.

   For USA and Canadian folk worried about the tiny amounts of bad isotopes floating in from the ocean.  It can barely be detected with leading edge instruments in North America.  It is harmless.  I heard recently that tuna contains 400% more radioactive cesium since Fukushima.  This is true but is not an issue since the natural levels of cesium can barely be measured.   Thus 400% greater than nothing is not worth worrying about.  The radioactivity of the natural radioactive potassium is 10,000 times higher than the cesium.

   Hormesis is the stimulation of any system by low doses of any agent. It is defined as the bio-positive response of something which is bio-negative in high doses[2]. Although the origin of hormesis hypothesis was from pharmacological studies, various studies have shown that there may be hormetic effects in low dose ionizing radiation. Although the belief of “No-Safe-Level” is still widespread, this acclaim is disproven by numerous positive biological effects of low dose ionizing radiation that are reported in hormetic or stimulatory models[3]. Recently, many scientists have clamored not to deprive people of bio-positive effects of low dose ionizing radiation and even proposed an annual single low dose ionizing radiation for everyone[4-7].

   In the 1960s, a group of French researchers showed that parasites, protozoa and bacteria which received ionizing radiation below the normal background level, had a reduced reproduction rate. Their study disclosed that ionizing radiation was essential for the survival of those microorganisms[8].

   In a research on mice, the incidence of leukemia, sarcoma and other cancers in irradiated mice with Cesium-137 at dose of 2.5-20 mSv was lower than the non-irradiated control group. The total number of malignancies in animals which were irradiated at dose of 10 mSv was approximately 30% lower than the non-irradiated group. Other studies also demonstrated the increased survival of irradiated animals at dose of 250-3000 mSv [9].

   Ionizing radiation and a complex of other DNA damaging factors such as UV rays, alkylating agents, oxidants and heat shock can induce responses in order to recompense the initial insult. The obtained results of expand international studies specified that when cells were exposed to low dose of ionizing radiation and other DNA damaging agents, they showed higher resistance to high dose of the same and in some cases similar factors[10].

   Adaptive response theory was reported for the first time in 1977 by Samson and Cairns. After discovery of this important phenomenon, it was determined that ionizing radiation could also induce this effect. In 1984, Olivieri et al. showed that exposure of human lymphocytes to labelled thymidine with tritium resulted in resistance against cellular damages due to high dose of X-rays. Their results known as “Radio-Adaptive Response” was very noteworthy since they represented that the radio-adaptive response reduced chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes by roughly 50%[11].

   Till now, numerous reports on the possible mechanism of the occurrence of adaptive effects and its factors have been published all over the world. In Iran, Mortazavi et al. have published several reports about the importance of radio-adaptive response, its effect on protection against radiation, role of natural radiation in occurrence of this effect and especially the incidence of radio-adaptive response in residence of high natural radiation areas of Ramsar County, Mazandaran Province in Iran.

   Have no fear!

   LikeLike

   Reply

5. Shame on you, Andrew for not doing a lot more research and understanding that this is a political ploy to scare the people of the world. Considering the quadrillions of gallons of water in the Pacific Ocean even Olympic-sized swimming pools of this stuff will not in any way affect human health. Andrew, please stop forwarding fear-mongering propaganda on your website. Thank you.

   LikeLike

   Reply

   1. Does that mean it’s still okay to eat sushi? I was dreading giving it up.
      Whether the Pacific is still safe to swim isn’t my issue. It’s the peoples need to know so they can decide for themselves. Fukushima melting down isn’t a propaganda ploy, it’s something that has been happening for seven years with no solution in sight. If it is an elaborate propaganda ploy, what would be the political point – just to scare people out of the water? I really don’t get it. I’m sure everyone is comforted knowing the radioactive fish they eat – which the food chain concentrates far above ambient water level – is healthy for them, but personally, I would prefer to get my dose of radiation from natural causes – not a man made fuck-up.

      LikeLike

      Reply

6. Have you ever looked at the Grampian Mountains in Scotland? Some theorists are claiming that they were uplifted by a tectonic rotational collision with the northern part of Scotland. Can you spot any electrical clues about this mountain formation?

   https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2017/02/10/shaping-scotland-in-two-shakes/

   LikeLike

   Reply

7. The arkblast notion is related to Psa 18 :7, 15. Regards, Ian

   LikeLiked by 1 person

   Reply